12.04.2005

Heart Rate Training Zones

Hello all. Mary and I are spending our Sunday doing laundry. Aren't we exciting? Yesterday we went on a nice bike ride. 2 hours on the road bike. I can't believe the difference between the road bike and the cyclocross bike. The road bike is so much more lively and quick. It felt nice finially riding it again. Last night was the Wild Rivers Multi Sports (Mary's tri club) party. It was pretty fun. I overheard many conversations about base training and heart rates, and I wanted to clarify some misconceptions people have about heart rate training. Here's another long post about exercise physiology. Read it and learn something.

Everyone i talked to last night had an arbitrary number they used to train at during all of base trainig. This number is calculated by subtracting your age from 180. This is a very inaccurate way of determining base training heart rate(s.) A much more accurate way to determine target heart rates is finding your heart rate at lactate thresold. Lactate thresold heart rate (LTHR) is easliy found by a simple test on the bike (a 30 minute time trial) but is harder to find while running or swimming, or some other activity. LTHR varies with each activity. Your LTHR while cycling would be very different then your LTHR while cross country skiing, for example, due to many more muscle groups being used while skiing. For examples we will use my current LTHR, which is 191 beats per minute.

But Brooks, why not train based off maximum heart rate?

Well I'm glad you asked. People like to use the generic 220 minus your age fomula to determine maximum heart rate, and base all heart rate zones from this number. This again is an inacurrate means of figuring out training zones for two reasons. 1. A person's maximum heart rate is rarely 220 minus your age, and 2. Not everyone's LTHR is the same percentage of maximum heart rate. Examples: My maximum heart rate is 205 beats per minute, not 194 (220-26.) Using this generic formula, lactate thresold is 85% of maximum heart rate. Again, my LTHR is 191 beats, or 93% of my maximum, no where near 85%.

What the hell does this mean, Brooks?

Lets say rider "A" has a max heart rate of 192 beats per minute, and his actual LTHR is 163 beats (85% of max,) and rider "B" has a max of 202, and LTHR of 190 (94% of max.) If both riders used the generic 85% of maximum as LTHR, rider "A" would be right at lacate threshold, training would be accurate and he would see improved performances. Rider "B" would be considerably under his LT. Rider "B's" training would suffer, because his training zones were inaccurate, and performances would stagnate, improve very slowly, or even decline.

Back to that 180 minus your age thing. If I used this while base training, I would have to keep my heart rate under 154 beats per minute (180-26=154.) This is at the high end of Zone 1 (65-81% of LTHR.) This trainig zone is for recovery, not for aerobic development! Zone 2 is used for aerobic develpment and is performed at 82-88% of LTHR, in my case 156-168 beats per minute. Zone 2 is an ideal base building heart rate zone.

In future posts, I will list all the training zones as a percentage of LTHR. There is also another, less scientific approach to training, that works incredibly well, called "Rating of Perceived Exertion," or RPE. I will get into RPE later.

So in summary, find your LTHR and base all training zones off of it and you will see improved race results. Train smarter, not harder!

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Brooks,

Also take into factor how your body has become "used" to the sport that you are taking the test in. Proof is out there that if I asked you to run 30 minutes to puking, your heart rate would be at a different level then riding your bike for 30 minutes then puking.

Take a look at Dr. Allen Lim's stuff on training with power. He has taken Friel's stuff and tweaked it even more.

pw

Brooks Leedahl said...

I touched on different events having different heart rates. I agree that wattage based training is the gold standard. I just wish i could afford an SRM.

Anonymous said...

Brooks,

Look at a powertap, or check in your area for somebody putting on a seminar. I have seen a couple of shops in CA putting them on.

The SRM is top notch, but comparing accuracy vs. price has shown that powertap gives some incredible results. Last year while wind tunnel testing they found the powertap to have fantastic results. And then there's the beauty of being able to switch it from your road bike to cross bike without to much hassle. You can even justify it as a spare rear wheel for both.

pw

Brian said...

I see that Molly Cameron got 13th at Cyclocross Nats in the Elite category. He must be a fast little mofo.

Tristan Schouten, a local Wisco kid, got 10th in the Elite category. He's a really good Mtb'er, wins all sorts of races around here. Does well at Cheq 40 and stuff.

Lane said...

Prosper awaits you in Kansas

Brooks Leedahl said...

aren't cx nats this weekend?
molly cameron got 13th at the verge new england championships. eric tonkin (3rd) and shannon skerritt (8th) are also portland guys.