Pros: light, strong, stiff, cut through the mud due to the aero profile, sexy
Cons: expensive!
i figure carbon has many times the impact resistance of aluminum, so a regular aluminum tubular rim would have been trashed as a result of the impact, where carbon is resilient enough to absorb some of the energy from the impact. if i was using clinchers, the rim would have been done for sure due to the rim's need for a "bead lock" (weak thin-walled sides.) here are some pics to better visualize. the first picture is of a normal clincher rim cross-section, the second pic is a tubular rim cross-section. notice the increased hight of the sidewalls of the clincher rim.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6795d/6795dfe195bdba3ec70c20ddc6a9e70c9bc05558" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/282e0/282e0b03909f7a11b3ea38b99bc8d78cf9436e7b" alt=""
tubular is definately the way to go for cyclocross, due to the infrequency of pinch-flats, and the ability to run really, really low pressure for better traction. the use of carbon tubulars is still up in the air though. i don't think i'd be using them if i didn't get a screaming deal on them from ebay. they work awesome and look pimp, i just wonder if the rim would be damaged at all if i had aluminum tubulars instead. the world will never know. if they die prematurely, i'll probably get some ksyrium tubulars next fall to replace them. i need to go prep the rim for gluing.
-brooks
1 comment:
Nice fan club. I especially like the Brooks vs Lance part.
You would think that a fan club would know how to spell your last name though... :D
Post a Comment